Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 29 of 107  [ 1070 posts ]  Go to page « 127 28 29 30 31107 »
Author Message
Trojan
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 17th, 2014, 5:09 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
Great stuff! I could have sworn it was a real design that never progressed past the prototype stage because it lost to the Hurricane in competition or something, before I remembered I was in the AU section.

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
waritem
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 17th, 2014, 9:40 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 354
Joined: August 4th, 2011, 6:37 am
Location: France
nighthunter wrote:
So, schemes still in the WIP phase, but here's the blanks, enjoy!

[ img ]
Exellent!
Spats and retractable gear, could be a plus, but it's yet a great design!
Wild you give a backstory?
Can't wait for it....................... :)

_________________
"You can rape history, if you give her a child"
Alexandre Dumas

JE SUIS CHARLIE


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 17th, 2014, 5:36 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
With a powerful enough engine retractable gear on something like this is going to make a negligible difference as you've got all the struts and bracing from the biplane configuration.
I'm intrigued to know of your engine and armament choice... I couldn't see anything prior to indicate either?

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 17th, 2014, 5:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Blackbuck wrote:
With a powerful enough engine retractable gear on something like this is going to make a negligible difference as you've got all the struts and bracing from the biplane configuration.
I'm intrigued to know of your engine and armament choice... I couldn't see anything prior to indicate either?
Brits plane so... 2 or 4 Vickers .303 and Bristol Mercury engine.

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 17th, 2014, 7:01 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
That's a rather all inclusive statement.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 18th, 2014, 8:42 am
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
I would say the armament is 4x .303in Vickers or 4x .303in Browning given the two troughs on the forward fuselage and the fairings above the engine.
The Mk.I looks to have a Bristol Mercury, the MK.II has a different cowling, might be a Bristol Perseus?

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 19th, 2014, 6:58 pm
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Haven't put much stock into what engines were used. LOL!

But the Mk.I has a Bristol Mercury Mk.V. I'll go with the Bristol Perseus for the Mk.Ia, and the Bristol Taurus for the Mk.II.

The Finnish Badger will probably be equipped with the Wright R-1820.

As to MG armorment, I hadn't gotten into anything more specific than the .303 cal. Although I'm thinking Vickers for the Mk.I and Mk.Ia, and Brownings on the Mk.II's.

Here's a slight update:

[ img ]

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me


Last edited by nighthunter on December 20th, 2014, 12:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 20th, 2014, 12:35 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Excellent!

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 20th, 2014, 12:38 am
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Thanks, Rhade, just did an update, and replaced the older image.

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: FD AU 3Posted: December 20th, 2014, 11:43 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
I love it, model Mk.I is absolutely stunning. It got that 30' style, mix of British(engine)-Italian(airframe and cockpit)-Polish(gullwing) look. At the same moment it's look very real, not AU but full historic accurate fighter. I would give hem a little different shape spats but it's just my personal preferences. ;)

Of course I ask for you permission to use it in my painfully slow build AU. ;)

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 29 of 107  [ 1070 posts ]  Return to “FD Scale Drawings” | Go to page « 127 28 29 30 31107 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 16 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]