Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 3  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3
Author Message
KHT
Post subject: Re: Erikrike Aviation CruiserPosted: April 20th, 2012, 9:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
I reworked the mast a lot for some reason, mostly asthetics. It's now more similar to Gotland's after her modernisation in 1944.
However, since I'm not done with the other details, I'm just posting a smaller picture of an idea I got, instead of using an aft mast(I don't like the thought of two masts on this). This won't probably get good response, but I might as well try it. It's essentially a very small, very tilting mini-mast put on the top back side of the aft funnel.
Good? Bad?
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Erikrike Aviation CruiserPosted: April 20th, 2012, 10:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
It's an efficient enough aerial spreader, which were quite common then, and later.

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: Erikrike Aviation CruiserPosted: April 20th, 2012, 10:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
Excellent.
Then here it is:
[ img ]
The planes still feel a bit scruffy-looking, but I really suck at flying vessels.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: Erikrike Aviation CruiserPosted: April 21st, 2012, 11:49 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
UPDATED!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Erikrike Aviation CruiserPosted: April 24th, 2012, 7:43 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
I like it. Looks like a usable scout for battlefleets.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
denodon
Post subject: Re: Erikrike Aviation CruiserPosted: April 24th, 2012, 4:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact: Website, YouTube
Interesting design I'll have to say. How many of these would be built? They look like they could lend themselves well to submarine tenders or numerous other support vessels with an aft deck like that.

_________________
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: Erikrike Aviation CruiserPosted: April 24th, 2012, 5:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
Ashley wrote:
I like it. Looks like a usable scout for battlefleets.
Thanks! :D
denodon wrote:
Interesting design I'll have to say. How many of these would be built? They look like they could lend themselves well to submarine tenders or numerous other support vessels with an aft deck like that.
Thanks. And two were built. In the mid-50s they were partly disarmed, but in 1960 they were recommissioned, with plans to rebuild them for helicopters instead of planes. Those plans were soon scrapped however, due to the expense.
I've thought about making a sub-tender though, so I might use a third hull of this class for it.
It's going to be a long time until such a ship appears though. I have very little idea on how they look and what to be included. Not to mention I have three-four designs that I'm already completly cluttered up by! ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
denodon
Post subject: Re: Erikrike Aviation CruiserPosted: April 24th, 2012, 5:10 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact: Website, YouTube
Ah alrighty. The sub tender would indeed be interesting. You'd need some heavy duty derricks for lifting torpedoes over to the submarine as well as fuel lines and store provisions. Sub tenders also often had limited repair capabilities so you might also want some smaller cranes for handling small steel sheets and/or other equipment.

_________________
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 3  [ 28 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 1 2 3

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]