Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 5 of 19  [ 187 posts ]  Go to page « 13 4 5 6 719 »
Author Message
Calis
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 22nd, 2016, 5:06 pm
Offline
Posts: 182
Joined: March 29th, 2013, 6:10 pm
Colosseum, I just have to say that I love your ORBAT of the Fantasian Kriegsmarine, it has a very unique mix of ships that gives it the feel of coalition force. Well Done and very well thought out.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 22nd, 2016, 7:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Well, the obvious thing that stands out is that you have a Bismarck still in service. Keeping the Iowas around was a pretty dubious idea and they were amongst the most modern ships in the world when they were launched and were first in line for upgrades during the war. The Bismarck on the other hand was a warmed over Bayern and about 20 years out of date by the time she was launched.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Redhorse
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 22nd, 2016, 9:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 499
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:19 am
It still took over 200 heavy caliber shell hits to sink her, and even that is still subject of debate.

_________________
Redhorse

Current Projects:
Republic of Texas Navy
FD Scale F-14s


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 22nd, 2016, 9:55 pm
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
To be honest several things strike me in this OrBat.
One is the existence of single-ship squadrons (geschwadern) - mainly with capital ships but also with auxiliaries. For example USN has separately "administrative" squadrons of ships, and separately task groups (like carrier battle groups, for example). I guess that these carrier or battleship squadrons are meant to be equivalent of, for example, US CVBG's and escorts would be taken from the other squadrons "as needed"? But with auxiliaries IMHO it would be more practical to keep them together with the ships they are meant to support (like is - or at least was - the case in Bundesmarine, where each squadron of warships, besides the appropriate number of their "primary" vessels had it's "own" tender/AO/AOR/whatever...).
Also these 2-3 ship mine warfare squadrons look bit tiny to be really effective.
And in naval aviation it seems that You're using the word "geschwader" - which in "real world" describes air wing - for formations that are mere squadrons ("staffel") or even flights/detachments.
But overall very impressive. :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 22nd, 2016, 10:06 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Well obviously the existence of a "modernized Bismarck" is to be taken with the same grain of salt as North Point's modernized Alaska... ;)

All very good points raised by eswube. My idea was that the FzTG (carrier squadron) would have the various ZG and FG (DesRon and FrigRons) attached as necessary - same with the TG (support ships). Though it may make more sense to consolidate these into coherent carrier groups.

I'm going to add more minesweepers to the various MsG. This also reminds me that I totally skipped the amphibious component of this navy...

I'm not too familiar with how the German words fit together, but my understanding was that Marinefliegerkommandos would have "squadrons" (geschwader) reporting to them. Is this not how the real-world Bundesmarine organizes itself? I just based the organization on the wiki article for the modern German navy.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 22nd, 2016, 10:23 pm
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Bit confusingly, in the navy, the "geschwader" translates into english-language "squadron" (of several ships), but in aviation it translates into english-language "air wing" (of 2-4 squadrons - "staffel"/plural "staffeln", each with around dozen aircraft).
In case of German navy, both ship and aviation "geschwadern" are formations of "equal level" (roughly equivalent of land forces regiment and headed by captains - "Kapitän zur See").
That said, I guess that such FzTG as CVBG equivalent would be rather led by rear-admiral.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 22nd, 2016, 10:25 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
OK, that makes sense to me now. So it's just a difference in translation. I'll update it accordingly.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 23rd, 2016, 12:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Redhorse wrote:
It still took over 200 heavy caliber shell hits to sink her, and even that is still subject of debate.
And had she been designed to be an unsinkable raft that would have been really impressive. However while it took about two hours to sink her she was effectively out of the fight after 15 minutes when one salvo managed to take out her main battery, main gun director and the command staff.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 24th, 2016, 1:54 am
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
I got bored and made one of the 2010 Akizuki derivatives in service with the Fantasian navy. I didn't bother with the railings and any other style concerns... this is the AU forum after all. I'm not even sure if the Akizuki design has VLS capable of launching Tomahawks, but well, there it is.

[ img ]

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: The SMSWorldPosted: August 24th, 2016, 8:48 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
We need more camouflage on modern ships, even if it's just for the rule of cool.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 5 of 19  [ 187 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 13 4 5 6 719 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]