Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 3  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 »
Author Message
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 27th, 2015, 9:14 pm
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Meet DDH-184...KAGA.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... ew&id=3048

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 28th, 2015, 1:07 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
Awesome, though expect China to get flustered

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 28th, 2015, 1:34 pm
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Of course, but I think Japan actually attempted to appease them on this one. If they really wanted to rattle the saber with China, they could've named the new ship Iwate. I was pretty surprised they didn't, actually.

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
seeker36340
Post subject: Re: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 28th, 2015, 5:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 617
Joined: June 9th, 2012, 10:21 pm
so when do they sneak the F-35s aboard *lol*


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Tobius
Post subject: Re: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 28th, 2015, 6:42 pm
Offline
Posts: 545
Joined: July 21st, 2015, 2:10 pm
seeker36340 wrote:
so when do they sneak the F-35s aboard *lol*
Hangers and lifts. Check those for clearance.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 30th, 2015, 2:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Tobius wrote:
seeker36340 wrote:
so when do they sneak the F-35s aboard *lol*
Hangers and lifts. Check those for clearance.
It is my understanding that they are large enough - as is the deck strength.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Tobius
Post subject: Re: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 30th, 2015, 5:14 pm
Offline
Posts: 545
Joined: July 21st, 2015, 2:10 pm
Cite sources? My understanding was that dimensionally the safety limits are not adequate on these ships for the F-35 (It's a flying blowtorch.), but I'm always open to better information.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 30th, 2015, 6:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Tobius wrote:
seeker36340 wrote:
so when do they sneak the F-35s aboard *lol*
Hangers and lifts. Check those for clearance.
Tobius wrote:
Cite sources? My understanding was that dimensionally the safety limits are not adequate on these ships for the F-35 (It's a flying blowtorch.), but I'm always open to better information.
it being a flying blowtorch has very little to do with hangar and elevator size :P
izumo hangar height: 22ft.
F-35 height: 14.2 ft
takeoff weight is close to that of an CH-47 or an Osprey, aircraft it seems likely to have designed the ship around. with the side elevator, it should be no problem to lower an aircraft that size into the hangar as well.
so, the only real factor why this vessel would not be able to take the F-35B (in theory, that is) is indeed the blowtorch factor: can it take the concentrated heated blast from the engine. the only ones who can answer that question are the people who actually build the thing, because I doubt that information will be made public before they decide to actually put some F-35B on board.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 30th, 2015, 6:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Tobius wrote:
Cite sources? My understanding was that dimensionally the safety limits are not adequate on these ships for the F-35 (It's a flying blowtorch.), but I'm always open to better information.
The jet issues can be manged with the improved surface coatings the US is refitting our LHDs with. Ace noted the hanger height isn't going to be an issue.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Tobius
Post subject: Re: Kido Butai Lives Again!Posted: August 30th, 2015, 8:53 pm
Offline
Posts: 545
Joined: July 21st, 2015, 2:10 pm
That's not my understanding at all.

Reiterated.

If the Americans are still having troubles as of April 2015, then the Japanese cannot, I write again, cannot operate the bird within acceptable safety margins. The USS America was supposedly designed with that flying blow torch in mind.

No way an Izumo has the same kind of facilities to handle STOVL aircraft.

With the Americans talking about ceramic landing matts and flame diverters as quick fixes, my question I respectfully submit, has not been answered.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 3  [ 22 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]