IMO
HMS Scylla emerges from the 1956 refit/reactivation
Not sure they would bother TCLs are TCL for a reason, mine damage to hull/engines will not be cheap (it might be cheaper + much better to just finish a newer hull, they cancelled a lot at the end of the war)
- Serve as flagship of RN South Atlantic SQDN until sold to Falklands in mid-'60's (in line with Harold Wilson Gov't's navy cuts of the period)
I think they would have given it away to a close ally ? (but its a bit late)
- Argentinian Invasion made possible due to HMFS Scylla being in transit back from the UK after what was to be final major refit -
Why you should buy lots of little ships and not a CL !
During the fighting it serves in tandem with HMS Plymouth in the liberation of South Georgia, as a NGFS platform and escort during the San Carlos landings (during which it shot down two Argentinian SkyHawks), in the fighting at Darwin/Goose Green and in the final assault on the mountains around Stanley.
I think you need to write a totally new war, as the increased population will have much more facilities (airports/roads/ports) so totally different dynamic to the war (big ports/roads mean MTB can be landed etc)
- Seacat and 3"/70 twin replaced with SeaWolf during 1983 refit (ship reviewed by HRH QEII during stay in the UK)
Not sure its worth it this late on.
Overall I think CLs are a bad idea for the FI (rather than as a RN unit paid for by the FI) and spesifically I think the Didos are just to old (Old AC electrical etc ?)/ hard used (WW2) they will not be worth rebuilding.
So If you want one keep (45/47-to-55/60) it with a very small modernisation (radars only ?) and then replace with something newer.
JSB