Hey guys, so this is just outline of my Treaty battleships for my AU, I'm still working on the Main Armament i don't know if i it should give her 16 inch or 12 inch guns, what what do you guys think.
![[ img ]](https://i.imgur.com/CefB3aB.png)
| Shipbucket https://111903.jhzobq.asia/forums/ |
|
| the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. https://111903.jhzobq.asia/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=7959 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | Armoured man [ September 29th, 2017, 1:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
Hey guys, so this is just outline of my Treaty battleships for my AU, I'm still working on the Main Armament i don't know if i it should give her 16 inch or 12 inch guns, what what do you guys think.
|
|
| Author: | KHT [ September 29th, 2017, 6:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
Depends on which treaty we're talking about(Washington or London) and the time of the design, I'd say, but I doubt they would go with 12" artillery on a battleship unless it was intended to be more a cruiser killer than a capital ship for the line of battle. Of the two, I would vote for the 16", but otherwise, maybe consider going with 15" or 14". |
|
| Author: | Armoured man [ September 29th, 2017, 8:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
thanks i think the 16 inch guns are a better choice then the 12 inch guns. ![[ img ]](https://i.imgur.com/VK2pi6W.png)
|
|
| Author: | Shigure [ September 29th, 2017, 9:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
I would suggest making it longer, the turrets are huge and look like triples. |
|
| Author: | Armoured man [ September 29th, 2017, 10:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
i'm trying to keep her a similar Length to the nelson class and the turrets are twins turrets, and triples turrets would add too much weight. and would Break the Displacement limit of the washington naval treaty. |
|
| Author: | Keisser [ September 29th, 2017, 4:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
Well, in general, triples even reduce weight. I mean, 8 guns in 4 twin turrets weight much more than 9 guns in 3 triples. So if you want to keep the threaty limit I'd suggest you to use triple turrets. |
|
| Author: | Armoured man [ September 29th, 2017, 8:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
thanks but i think keep the twins turrets like the Colorado class, is a Displacement of 33,666 tons to light for her or or should she be heavier. ![[ img ]](https://i.imgur.com/jA8pwXH.png)
|
|
| Author: | emperor_andreas [ September 30th, 2017, 12:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
The bow looks kinda short to me for some reason...guess I'm just used to battleships with long, sweeping lines or something.  Still, nice work thus far!
|
|
| Author: | Armoured man [ September 30th, 2017, 11:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
thanks i was mostly inspired by the 29,200 Tons Minimum Battleship Design drawn by Hood. |
|
| Author: | Keisser [ September 30th, 2017, 3:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: the Kantai navys Treaty battleships. |
I suggest you to use the SpringSharp to calculate displacement and other interesting things. |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|