Shipbucket https://111903.jhzobq.asia/forums/ |
|
HSwMS Tre Kronor - A Different Direction https://111903.jhzobq.asia/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=7216 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | KHT [ August 13th, 2016, 11:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | HSwMS Tre Kronor - A Different Direction |
Praying to all that is holy that the link works... A first for posting a new thread in a few years. What is this all about? Well... On another forum, I found someone who'd kindly made and shared a Drive folder with various Swedish Never Weres. Getting a good look on the Tre Kronor armoured cruiser, I started fiddling with the idea of how she might've looked like a heavy cruiser instead(Because... heavy cruisers. I have a shrine for them.). Being a Swedish vessel, she would obviously ship 21 cm.(8,3") guns - of which there are eight - rather than "pure" 8" guns. Rather than twelve 12 cm.(4.7") DP guns, I settled for eight. She'd roughly follow the armour scheme of the Tre Kronor armoured cruiser, with 125 mm(4.9") sides and 60 mm(2.4") deck. Turret fronts reduced to 200 mm(7.9"), and the conning tower to 150 mm(5.9"). Looking at the faster of the heavier NWs of the RSwN, I decided on a rather modest top speed of 29 knots, and a range equal to the real life Tre Kronor class light cruisers. The closest contemporary design of the RSwN I could find also had a crane aft for a single Hawker Osprey(no catapult), so I decided to follow point. She landed at some 9 700 tonnes at standard displacement. Deffinately one of my barer drawings, and could probably use some polishing, but I wanted to post it nonetheless. Enter ship name, Enter country Enter ship type laid down 1934 Displacement: 9 233 t light; 9 674 t standard; 10 170 t normal; 10 567 t full load Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep) (594,94 ft / 580,71 ft) x 65,62 ft x (18,70 / 19,25 ft) (181,34 m / 177,00 m) x 20,00 m x (5,70 / 5,87 m) Armament: 8 - 8,27" / 210 mm 50,0 cal guns - 299,15lbs / 135,69kg shells, 120 per gun Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1934 Model 4 x 2-gun mounts on centreline ends, evenly spread 2 raised mounts - superfiring 8 - 4,72" / 120 mm 45,0 cal guns - 53,18lbs / 24,12kg shells, 300 per gun Dual purpose guns in deck and hoist mounts, 1934 Model 4 x Twin mounts on sides, evenly spread 18 - 0,98" / 25,0 mm 47,0 cal guns - 0,51lbs / 0,23kg shells, 1 500 per gun Breech loading guns in deck mounts, 1934 Model 6 x Twin mounts on sides, evenly spread 2 raised mounts 3 x Twin mounts on centreline, evenly spread 3 double raised mounts Weight of broadside 2 828 lbs / 1 283 kg Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 4,92" / 125 mm 367,45 ft / 112,00 m 11,15 ft / 3,40 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 97 % of normal length - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 7,87" / 200 mm 3,94" / 100 mm 7,87" / 200 mm 2nd: 0,98" / 25 mm 0,39" / 10 mm 0,98" / 25 mm - Armoured deck - single deck: For and Aft decks: 2,36" / 60 mm - Conning towers: Forward 5,91" / 150 mm, Aft 0,00" / 0 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 2 shafts, 59 029 shp / 44 036 Kw = 29,00 kts Range 4 350nm at 14,00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 893 tons Complement: 506 - 658 Cost: £4,181 million / $16,724 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 844 tons, 8,3 % - Guns: 844 tons, 8,3 % Armour: 2 554 tons, 25,1 % - Belts: 842 tons, 8,3 % - Armament: 743 tons, 7,3 % - Armour Deck: 910 tons, 9,0 % - Conning Tower: 60 tons, 0,6 % Machinery: 1 698 tons, 16,7 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 3 976 tons, 39,1 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 937 tons, 9,2 % Miscellaneous weights: 160 tons, 1,6 % - On freeboard deck: 120 tons - Above deck: 40 tons Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 14 221 lbs / 6 451 Kg = 50,3 x 8,3 " / 210 mm shells or 2,1 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,07 Metacentric height 3,1 ft / 0,9 m Roll period: 15,8 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 51 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,54 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1,03 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak, a normal bow and a cruiser stern Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0,500 / 0,504 Length to Beam Ratio: 8,85 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 24,10 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 53 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 49 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 24,00 degrees Stern overhang: 3,28 ft / 1,00 m Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length): Fore end, Aft end - Forecastle: 20,00 %, 24,61 ft / 7,50 m, 21,65 ft / 6,60 m - Forward deck: 30,00 %, 21,65 ft / 6,60 m, 20,67 ft / 6,30 m - Aft deck: 35,00 %, 12,80 ft / 3,90 m, 12,80 ft / 3,90 m - Quarter deck: 15,00 %, 12,80 ft / 3,90 m, 12,80 ft / 3,90 m - Average freeboard: 17,31 ft / 5,28 m Ship tends to be wet forward Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 81,1 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 159,2 % Waterplane Area: 25 385 Square feet or 2 358 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 115 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 121 lbs/sq ft or 590 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0,98 - Longitudinal: 1,16 - Overall: 1,00 Excellent machinery, storage, compartmentation space Excellent accommodation and workspace room Doubtless bigger and more expensive than the what Swedish government would be willing to approve, but a fun thought excercise for myself. Probably one of the centerpieces if I ever feel like making a Baltic Mare Suecia AU. |
Author: | Gollevainen [ August 14th, 2016, 5:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: HSwMS Tre Kronor - A Different Direction |
looks really good |
Author: | Krakatoa [ August 14th, 2016, 6:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: HSwMS Tre Kronor - A Different Direction |
Great work KHT, you certainly have got the 'cruiser' down pat. Nice work on the ships boats as well, I do not remember seeing them anywhere else. |
Author: | Hood [ August 14th, 2016, 3:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: HSwMS Tre Kronor - A Different Direction |
I think its a good concept and an interesting vessel. Nice work. |
Author: | eswube [ August 14th, 2016, 3:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: HSwMS Tre Kronor - A Different Direction |
I really like Your ship designs. Even if they are sometimes "bare" (and I wouldn't say that really), they are well thought and have a good, ellegant looks. |
Author: | citizen lambda [ August 14th, 2016, 6:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: HSwMS Tre Kronor - A Different Direction |
This design does look good. I'm no expert, but your version certainly has a certain Swedish flair that makes it credible. It might be bare now, but you can clearly add relief and details by borrowing from the original Tre Kronor or other Swedish ships. |
Author: | KHT [ August 14th, 2016, 10:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: HSwMS Tre Kronor - A Different Direction |
Thanks all. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |